User blog:Editor Julie/Bloom's Power Are Now Mixed...

Hi guys. After watching Episode 606 over and over again, I've come to a theory for Bloom's fire/flame power.

Vortex's Fire & Dragon's Fire
It is revealed in the episode that Bloom has lost some of her Dragon Flame, which is fatal. Then she was dropped by Diaspro into the Vortex of Flames, where she regains her power, defeats the five-headed dragon and gains her Bloomix.

If Bloom only regains her Dragon Flame powers
At first, I thought that the vortex flames is the Dragon Flame, which is why the vortex can restore Bloom's power and enable her to gain Bloomix and get out alive. But that also leaves me with some unlogical left-overs.

How did she destroy the Fire Eaters?

Just like Daphne said, they can only be destroyed using the Vortex of Flame's fire. So if Bloom only regains her Dragon Flame, than she shouldn't be able to defeat those monsters.

If Bloom's Dragon Flame is completely replaced by the Vortex of Flame's fire
In this case, she should be able to defeat the Fire Eaters.

However, there is one weakness...

She won't be able to gain her Bloomix, and she won't be the Guardian of the Dragon's Flame.

If Bloom's Dragon Flame is mixed with the Vortex of Flames's fire
This is my theory!

This means that she can both defeat the Fire Eaters, and earn Bloomix! Remember, as long as the fairy have a little of the Dragon Flame, she can gain Bloomix!

The Dragon's Flame can't be taken away from its guardian, but nobody says anything if it can be reduced, or shared by the guardian herself or not.

Why I think that the Vortex's Flames and Dragon Flames are different
Again, Daphne says that the Fire Eaters can only be destroyed with the Vortex of Flames's fire. If that Dragon and Vortex Flames are the same, then why can't she just say it can be destroyed by the Dragon's Flame? Plus, the Winx have the Dragon Flame, but they can't even kill a single Fire Eater.

What do you think?
I'd love it if you can share your ideas or theories about this, or whether my theory is logical, or not. I've put my theory in some of the articles, but I don't think it's against the rules. Standards says that theories can be passed on, as long as it is specified or has a strong reason.

So what do you guys think about this? Please comment on what you think!

Thanks for your time :)

-- Julie ❄ My talk page ツ 08:23, January 14, 2014 (UTC)