User talk:Ace Grit the Darkus Hero

Hello Ace, please be sure do not use contractions (e.g. isn't, aren't, they're, etc.), write them out. Thank you. WhiteJasmineFlower (talk) 19:41, June 26, 2020 (UTC)WhiteJasmineFlower

Thank you. And I know you're new so if you have any questions, let me know and be sure to follow the rules. WhiteJasmineFlower (talk) 20:02, June 26, 2020 (UTC)WhiteJasmineFlower

Hm, yeah, I think "companions" is more suitable. Icy didn't hesitate to call them friends either from what I can remember. With the word "sisters" it can be used to emphasize how close their bond is. In other words, you're so close you're like family even if you're not related by blood. With the Ancestral Witches, I think it should be family but now with the retcon, I'm unsure.

For now, Icy, Darcy and Stormy's pages are fine. So leave them be for now. WhiteJasmineFlower (talk) 21:07, June 26, 2020 (UTC)WhiteJasmineFlower

That Daphne "signature" clearly is not official material. The Roxy signature appeared on a magazine issue released shortly after season 4, as she intended to be a part of the club. If you recognize, there are something "meant to be" for the main girls only. Long story short, I hope you get to the point. -- 12:56, September 1, 2020 (UTC)

I don't think I put my point of "girl" or "woman" there and for certain, I don't understand the fuss you were trying to make with the "except". The point is Daphne has never had any official material of her signature, and Roxy was intended to be the 7th member of the Winx (though discarded in season 5), hence an comic issue entitled Roxy the 7th fairy. And by far I saw nothing that Daphne was also intended to be a member of the club. If you feel like reading explanation is that time-consuming, why you asked in the first place and then tried to pull your own leg? If you simply say something just to have someone agreed that you're politically correct or something, I'm afraid you're calling the wrong number. -- 14:23, September 1, 2020 (UTC)

Yep. Someone added a random photo (not even from an official source) on an article, assuming it's signature of someone, and got that edit reverted, demanded explanation, deny the explanation and still claims they're correct. Yep. We all see how things are going. So if you enjoy being dramatic, go on, I won't stop you as I have stuffs to do and not much spare time to create or enjoy dramas. -- 14:53, September 1, 2020 (UTC)