User talk:Parker Green

Please don't link the classes in the infoboxes or add an infobox to an animal species page unless it's the individual character (i.e. Faragonda's Digmole). Thank you. WhiteJasmineFlower (talk) 02:43, April 3, 2020 (UTC)WhiteJasmineFlower

No problem. And that's fine, you can make it more specific by changing it. WhiteJasmineFlower (talk) 22:45, April 3, 2020 (UTC)WhiteJasmineFlower

I have never intended to make that template "specific" like you intended it to be. Kindly just adapt to the wiki. -- 06:59, April 28, 2020 (UTC)

I don't mind that information but I'm not the Bureaucrat, so I don't have the authority over it. I am however, getting tired of this editing war, please resolve this with the Bureaucrat and not me. And you've already signed it. WhiteJasmineFlower (talk) 20:47, October 2, 2020 (UTC)WhiteJasmineFlower

I failed to see why it's important when it's from a specific location and not international. A user removed once and I had to removed it twice if I don't wrongly remember so technically I'm not the only one seeing that information useless. It may be interesting to you, but not necessary to people here. -- 11:13, October 4, 2020 (UTC)

It didn't seem necessary to me. The information appeared too little to need it unless you were planning to add more to it? WhiteJasmineFlower (talk) 05:26, 17 October 2020 (UTC)WhiteJasmineFlower

Pixies and fairies revisited (response)
Hey Parker Green! Sorry it took me long to get back to you. You asked whether the Trix have ever called Pixies "pets" as a derogatory term, and while I can't think of an instance where this has happened, it wouldn't be out of character if they did.

I know that in season 3 episodes 20 and 21, the Trix and Valtor use a number of pejoratives against the Pixies, like "mini-fairies," "little-ones," "pipsqueak," "pests," and "gnats." I'm sure there were many more instances were the Trix insulted the Pixies, particularly in season 2, but I can't think of any unless I were to rewatch the show. Also, keep in mind that I watched the Cinelume version; it's possible that in the 4Kids dub or even in the original Italian version, the Trix and other characters used "pets" as an insult or another similar term. Again, it wouldn't be out of character if they did. In fact, I suspect they have.

Hopefully this answers your question. Have a nice rest of your week!

Because it's not necessary.  ♪♫•*¨*•.¸Tsurumaru Kuninaga • Talk • Contribs¸.•*¨*•♫♪

"Hikizutte baka da yo ne? / Kimi to nara kitto ikeru kara, ikeru ka na～*" 07:27, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

My Response
Okay, thank you. Coincidentally, the Trix have called the Winx "pixies", so that's kind of cultural appropriation to use the name of an existing species as an insult. But then again, they are evil. 11:15 AM (EST) 12/3/2020 User: Parker Green.

OMG!
I didn't even think about that, but you're right! 11/5/2021 12:31 PM (EDT) User: Parker Green

Anon3610 (talk) 01:16, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Anon3610 (talk) 16:28, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Anon3610 (talk) 16:39, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Please don’t add info boxes to articles with very little information. Thank you. --WhiteJasmineFlower (talk) 21:05, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
 * You know, you CAN add more information instead of removing them! You're welcome, not. >:( (User: Parker Green 6/6/2022, 5:15 PM (EDT).

Well, I didn't appreciate the blog about me getting on your nerves but it's whatever. And as I've said, these particular articles do not provide enough information for a infobox. I can't do anything about it if more information is not provided. If they did, there would be an infobox long ago. I just want to make this clear that I didn't ignore these articles. And you do realize you've made other edits that weren't removed right?

If you have OCD, are you sure it's a good idea to be editing here where articles are missing things because either it's not necessary or incomplete? Wouldn't that just trigger your OCD and stress you out more?? I'm not pointing fingers, I'm just concerned. --WhiteJasmineFlower (talk) 22:36, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Actually, I can manage now that I understand. Thank you for explaining it to me. And I'm sorry for the nasty blog post. User:Parker Green 8:59 PM (EDT), 6/6/2022.

It's alright. :] --WhiteJasmineFlower (talk) 02:59, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

About Tecna
Again just like with Bloom and the idea of transforming into a dragon, there is no reason for any fairy to be anything else in addition to their primary powers. Fairy magic does it all. And if it doesn't, there are others who can help them. And that's where more characters come into play and more complex relationships start to emerge. There are and there should always be conceptual limitations for each of them. You can't just build more and more features on top of your favourite hero. A hero should always be a little underdeveloped, not overdeveloped. And I'm not that much into technical aspects to talk about Tecna being a robot :) There is no sense to make her a piece of equipment or a machine :) Considering that a machine cannot be a fairy with magical abilities.

Rebutle
I don't appreciate your condescending attitude. I only presented the robot thing because there's a fan theory that Tecna died in the snow and transferred her consciousness into a robot, which I don't believe in, personally. "a machine cannot be a fairy with magical abilities." Says who? The Winx Club universe has various forms of magic technology, so don't be so dismissive of a robot fairy. As for Bloom being able to turn into a dragon, you took a giant crap on my idea, and I didn't appreciate that. Also, "Should always remain underdeveloped"? Are you kidding me? Do you think girls aren't smart enough to understand a complex character? You know, you don't seem very nice. >:( 4:19 PM (EDT), 9/29/2022, User: Parker Green.